Note: All subscription options are auto-renew.
Subscribers can change their auto-renew status by e-mailing subscribe@summitissues.com.

Your subscription includes:

  • About 22 e-newsletters a year to keep you up-to-date with the latest developments.
  • Reference Pages that tell you what you need to know about nonprofit law and governance.
  • subscribeDirect links to case opinions and regulations.
  • Weekly answer to a reader's question.
  • Searchable archive to answer your questions 24/7.
  • Member-only access to downloadable templates and forms.
  • Member-only forum to interact with other subscribers.

Nick Yzzi

Nick Yzzi

E-mail: This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Monday, August 29 2011 07:29

Question: Designated Offerings

Our church held its annual Sacrificial Offering. One of the goals was for a new stove and for the purchase of a van. There is about $4,000 remaining in the fund after the two purchases.  A business meeting was scheduled to vote to re-designate the funds for roof repair.  We have a member who objects to the re-designation of funds who claims that we would be in violation of PA state law. We would appreciate your advice on this.

Answer:

Questions surrounding designated gifts and offerings may be the #1 topic of all the questions we receive. Here is my response:

Question:  Designated Offerings

Our church held its annual Sacrificial Offering. One of the goals was for a new stove and for the purchase of a van. There is about $4,000 remaining in the fund after the two purchases.  A business meeting was scheduled to vote to re-designate the funds for roof repair.  We have a member who objects to the re-designation of funds who claims that we would be in violation of PA state law. We would appreciate your advice on this.

Answer:

Questions surrounding designated gifts and offerings may be the #1 topic of all the questions we receive. Here is my response:

1-If you can identify the donors, ask them if they would release the excess funds for the roof project. Unfortunately, identifying all of the donors in a general offering is probably impossible.

2-You can have a business meeting to vote on how the unused designated funds of those donors whom you CANNOT identify can be spent.

3- The practical issue may be what affect this has on the congregation as a potential serious issue. If it’s just a small group who oppose any re-designation, you need to evaluate their impact on the church itself, on the credibility of the leadership, its impact on future offerings and any resultant negative community publicity. Sometimes it’s just not worth the battle. On the other hand, it appears that the leadership did all it could to ensure that the funds were used properly and that this is really a minor issue in the value of dollars. If you are willing to assume some risk of a disruption, assuming the negative impact is minimal, I would go for the business meeting since it appears to have been handled with integrity.

4-But the safest way to settle this is to petition the Pa State Attorney General for his opinion/approval. This appears to be overkill for such a small amount of money, and I would think that they would consider it a nuisance. You may need an attorney to do that which may cost more than the total of the funds in question.  But you can try to just send a letter to the AG first to get his opinion. If he is willing to render an opinion and states that a business meeting is appropriate, then do so. That would surely exonerate the leadership from any legal criticism (although criticism and disruption may still occur).

In the future, ensure that future special offerings contain language that gives the church leadership or members broader authority on the disposition of unspent funds, such as a Statement that unused Funds may be spent on those projects that the Board deems appropriate, or unused funds will be determined by a business meeting of the church.

It’s just unfortunate that such matters consume so much of the energy that can directed elsewhere in ministry.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

               

 

 

 

IRS Increases Mileage Rate to 55.5 Cents per Mile

New Rates starts July 1, 2011

The Internal Revenue Service announced on June 23, 2011 (Announcement 2011-40) that they will increase the optional standard mileage rates for the final six months of 2011 effective July 1, 2011. The current mileage rate of 51 cents per mile will increase to 55.5 cents per mile.

Answer:

Yes indeed, 275,000 non-profits lost their tax exemptions last week (See Article: Non Profits Lose Tax Exemption). I would say that you should NOT voluntarily file a Form 990.

In fact, IRS prefers that organizations and individuals don’t file reports or returns unless they are required to do so. It is possible that some type of reporting could be mandated in the future for churches and church-related ministries (See Article: Senate Oversight of Churches, but since there is no current requirement, I recommend that you not voluntarily file a Form 990.

Thursday, June 09 2011 10:02

Non Profits Lose Tax Exemption

On 6/8/11, the IRS released a listing of 275,000 Tax Exempt Organizations that have automatically lost their tax-exempt status because they have not filed annual reports as required for the past three years (2007, 2008 and 2009).

The Pension Protection Act (PPA) of 2006 required most Tax Exempt Organizations to file an annual information return with the IRS. In the past many of these smaller Organizations were not required to file any reports with the IRS. Depending on the size (Gross Revenue) of the Organization, a Form 990, Form 990-EZ or usually Form 990-N (called a postcard and filed online) was required. Failure to fie the appropriate form for three consecutive years results in automatic revocation of their Tax Exempt status.

Friday, May 20 2011 09:35

Charitable Deductions

Written Acknowledgment is Affirmed by the IRS

The IRS has issued e-mail advice dated 5/20/11 that affirms that a taxpayer who makes a charitable gift and fails to obtain a contemporaneous written acknowledgment from the charitable organization cannot claim an income tax charitable deduction.

In Schrimsher v. Commissioner, T.C. Memo 2011-71 (March 28, 2011), the Tax Court recently held that taxpayers' failure to obtain a contemporaneous written acknowledgment resulted in disallowance of a charitable contribution deduction. The law is well settled that no deduction is allowed unless the taxpayer substantiates the deduction with a contemporaneous written acknowledgment.

IRS Tax Tip 2011-57, March 22, 2011

Charitable contributions made to qualified organizations may help lower your tax bill. The IRS has put together the following eight tips to help ensure your contributions pay off on your tax return.

1. If your goal is a legitimate tax deduction, then you must be giving to a qualified organization. Also, you cannot deduct contributions made to specific individuals, political organizations and candidates. See IRS Publication 526, Charitable Contributions, for rules on what constitutes a qualified organization.

2. To deduct a charitable contribution, you must file Form 1040 and itemize deductions on Schedule A.

Sunday, May 01 2011 12:51

Conflict of Interest Policy

Not an IRS requirement--but highly suggested for all Non-Profits

There is no legal requirement to have a conflict of interest policy.  But having such a Policy is clearly best practices for any Non-profit organization including ministries.

As is well known, churches and church related ministries are NOT subject to the filing of the Form 990 Annual Report that other Non-Profits are required to file. For those Non-profits that are required to File Form 990, the Form 990 itself asks if a Conflict of Interest Policy exists and specifically asks whether officers, directors and key employees are required to disclose annually.

Tuesday, March 01 2011 07:52

Senate Oversight of Churches

In November 2007, Senator Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), member of the U.S. Senate Finance Committee instituted inquiries into 6 Media ministries including Benny Hinn,  Joyce Meyer, Kenneth & Gloria Copeland, Randy & Paula White,  Eddie Long and Creflo & Taffi Dollar.

Preliminary research conducted by his staff indicated that there are almost 100 entities related to the six churches as well as the ministers. The potential concerns & issues included Inurement (personal use of non-profit assets), Housing allowances, whistleblower intimidation, overseas activities, unreported income and accountability. 3rd party information has been secured by the Senate Finance Committee on all parties involved in the Inquiries.

On December 17, 2010 President Obama signed a bi-partisan tax bill which, among other things, extended the Bush tax cuts which were about to expire.

Millions of workers will see their take-home pay rise during 2011 because the Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 provides a 2% payroll tax cut for employees, reducing their Social Security tax withholding rate from 6.2% to 4.2% of wages paid.

Answer:

You are correct that non-profits including ministries and churches may qualify for a tax credit if they pay at least 50% of the cost of health insurance premiums for their employees. This is a tax benefit available from the federal  government to non-profit organizations even though nonprofits pay no income tax.

Start
Prev
1
Page 1 of 3
  • Facebook Page: 189178301101133
  • Linked In: nickyzzi
  • Twitter: summitissues
  • External Link: www.cbs.edu

Newsletter Sign Up

join our mailing list
* indicates required